Privacy in Torchwood
Mar. 10th, 2011 09:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is a trope that I find a bit disturbing, so I'm probably come across as judgey as a judge, but this is not a post to say “don't do this ever” so much as “please can you think about this and engage with me in discussion about it”.
The trope I'm thinking of is the one where Tosh hacks into the CCTV archives to retrieve deleted or protected footage of Jack and Ianto having sex.
There is no trope in Torchwood fanfiction that makes me backbutton faster. Even if the footage weren't password protected or deleted, that would be weird, but to deliberately and determinedly invade the privacy of not just your friends, but the man who saved you from UNIT's clutches?
That's not just creepy and a betrayal of their friendship, it's also illegal. The extent of the illegality is questionable, as there is no privacy law in England and Wales, but it would be comparable to the current case regarding the News of the World, who hacked into people's answering machines to get stories. As this is a current case, no one knows what the outcome will be (ETA: Four months later and it's bringing down the government), but if you want to look at the legal arguments surrounding it you can look at the arguments being put forwards in the media about that case and then subtract the celebrity element and put friendships in, for added squick.
Not that Torchwood cares about the legality of things like that all that much, but I suspect they would care more if it were their own privacy at question.
If we look at this trope from the start:
Stage 1: Jack and Ianto have sex at work. This could be because they're exhibitionists, or it could be because they live in the Hub. Going with option 2, they live in the Hub because someone has to be there to monitor the Rift and take the night callouts, so they are in the Hub, having sex there, so that Tosh and the others don't have to be.
Stage 2: They, being covered at all hours, delete the recorded footage of them having sex. Or maybe they just put it into a special folder and put a password on it so that they can access it later but no one else can get at it.. Either way, they ensure that their teammates can't get at it.
Stage 3: Tosh (or Gwen, but usually Tosh) breaks through the passwords or retrieves the deleted footage.
On what planet is that okay?
And to top it off, it's with Jack – the one who guards his secrets like Cerberus does the underworld, with lots of growling and not-fun biting if you get too close – and Ianto – the one who guards his secrets like... you can see where this is going.
So before you have Tosh oh-so-cleverly hacking through the layers of passwords, or carefully retrieving the deleted footage, please think about what she's about to do? And maybe how you'd feel if one of your friends – on whom your life often depended – was watching you having sex without your knowledge and consent.
Jack and Ianto have little enough privacy as it is. I'm sure Tosh wouldn't begrudge them what they tried to hold on to.
Tl;dr: There's a reason peeping Toms go to prison or get restraining orders.
The trope I'm thinking of is the one where Tosh hacks into the CCTV archives to retrieve deleted or protected footage of Jack and Ianto having sex.
There is no trope in Torchwood fanfiction that makes me backbutton faster. Even if the footage weren't password protected or deleted, that would be weird, but to deliberately and determinedly invade the privacy of not just your friends, but the man who saved you from UNIT's clutches?
That's not just creepy and a betrayal of their friendship, it's also illegal. The extent of the illegality is questionable, as there is no privacy law in England and Wales, but it would be comparable to the current case regarding the News of the World, who hacked into people's answering machines to get stories. As this is a current case, no one knows what the outcome will be (ETA: Four months later and it's bringing down the government), but if you want to look at the legal arguments surrounding it you can look at the arguments being put forwards in the media about that case and then subtract the celebrity element and put friendships in, for added squick.
Not that Torchwood cares about the legality of things like that all that much, but I suspect they would care more if it were their own privacy at question.
If we look at this trope from the start:
Stage 1: Jack and Ianto have sex at work. This could be because they're exhibitionists, or it could be because they live in the Hub. Going with option 2, they live in the Hub because someone has to be there to monitor the Rift and take the night callouts, so they are in the Hub, having sex there, so that Tosh and the others don't have to be.
Stage 2: They, being covered at all hours, delete the recorded footage of them having sex. Or maybe they just put it into a special folder and put a password on it so that they can access it later but no one else can get at it.. Either way, they ensure that their teammates can't get at it.
Stage 3: Tosh (or Gwen, but usually Tosh) breaks through the passwords or retrieves the deleted footage.
On what planet is that okay?
And to top it off, it's with Jack – the one who guards his secrets like Cerberus does the underworld, with lots of growling and not-fun biting if you get too close – and Ianto – the one who guards his secrets like... you can see where this is going.
So before you have Tosh oh-so-cleverly hacking through the layers of passwords, or carefully retrieving the deleted footage, please think about what she's about to do? And maybe how you'd feel if one of your friends – on whom your life often depended – was watching you having sex without your knowledge and consent.
Jack and Ianto have little enough privacy as it is. I'm sure Tosh wouldn't begrudge them what they tried to hold on to.
Tl;dr: There's a reason peeping Toms go to prison or get restraining orders.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 09:41 pm (UTC)what also really annoys me is that in most of the fics, jack and ianto seem to be perfectly okay with it! what canon are these people watching?????
aside from the fact that jack and ianto are both just as private about their relationship as well as their personal lives, tosh doesn't seem to be that kind of person at all.
surely she out of all of them would understand the need for privacy and i also cannot see her then sending that footage to other members of the team or keeping it for herself. it just *shudders* it doesn't work for me and i really don't see how it works for others.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:06 pm (UTC)And I am answering you in reverse, but whatever. I possibly do take fanfic too seriously, but it's the proliferation of the trope and the fact that people don't seem to think about it that worries me.
Of course, I don't particularly like thinking about photos or videos of the boys naked (which is why my favourite erotic scenes involve layers), so maybe I'm just more objective or just want the footage deleted. Idk.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:18 pm (UTC)I'm glad they did pair Jack with Ianto though, as I think if he carried on that way with enough characters he would have worn thin very quickly, and just been this creepy lothario type.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:42 pm (UTC)He's not brilliant, but he's not Alice/Emily, either.
And he's not Yvonne.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 11:07 pm (UTC)Not that I think Ianto would have any issues with telling Jack where to go if he didn't want sex from the start of S2 onwards, at least, and I don't buy that Jack would want to, either.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 04:38 pm (UTC)I can only see the gun range thing in a very negative light, of Jack being innappropriate, for the reasons that you say. I don't really like that episode anyhow, but there are a few scenes in TW that I never bother to rewatch, and that's one of them. I find it very uncomfortable.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:58 pm (UTC)But yeah, I don't think they had things like characterisation, really. Most of what we know of the characters has been built up over the last few years through fanfiction, not through the canon.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:58 pm (UTC)Someone had to go bugger that up though, didn't they?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:56 pm (UTC)But yeah, 'he's from the future' is a lousy excuse.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-18 05:12 am (UTC)But yeah, Jack isn't the best boss.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 09:56 pm (UTC)I have only read these stories if from an author I like, so it's pretty rare that I read them. The authors I read tend not to write them, or if they do they are pretty tame. However I do remember once coming apon a story, which I didn't actually read much of, where Tosh and Gwen and other TW women (Martha maybe?) were having girls night's in to watch DVD's of Jack and Ianto having sex. It was just beyond ludicrous. I think maybe also that's the thing, people writing it don't think that through, and just write it for the porn value, or something. It's a fantasy, that in real life would be rather nasty, as you have pointed out.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:09 pm (UTC)They would hate us, if they knew
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 09:58 pm (UTC)I would agree that Jack and Ianto are both private people, but Jack is pretty open about sexual matters with his teammates. When Gwen catches them in the greenhouse, Ianto is visibly embarassed. Jack invites her to join in.
A lot of times in fanfic their relationship is shown to be more permanent/secure/comfortable than it is on the show. So would they be comfortable with someone watching them on tape in these circumstances, I don't know?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 11:35 pm (UTC)Actually, that's a fic I would like to read. Yes, it is. So, if anyone wants to use a voyeur, use him. For me? Please?
Ahem. Anyway. To your point, I do agree that it is a senseless trope. However, yeah, I'll read anything well written. And I can see (canon) Tosh doing that ONLY if she has reason to believe that Jack is abusing Ianto, or something. And even that's a stretch and certainly much more analytical than pleasurable. Pleasure could be a side effect, though?
So really, I'm just rambling now. Don't mind me. Ultimately I agree, but am guilty, too. The end. :-/
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 11:53 pm (UTC)Gwen would be more likely to either giggle uncontrollably every time she saw them forever after, or decide that Jack was indeed abusing Ianto.
I used to read this as long as it was well written, but then I thought about it too much, and now I get ragey. Clearly I need to stop thinking.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 12:50 am (UTC)Owen, we know, would watch and record people shagging on CCTV, since he was perving on Gwen and Carys kissing. And nobody was really horrified that it could be observed. Tosh, on the other hand, wasn't too pleased with the mind-reading voyeurism she experienced wearing the necklace, so I don't think she'd randomly look at footage hoping to run across shagvids.
Appropriate icon is appropriate!!! :D
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 01:02 am (UTC)Owen, yes, totally would. It's possibly how he knew to make the 'part time shag' comment.
And appropriate icon is very appropriate. I do love that frond for modesty.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 03:05 am (UTC)Even though we are all voyeurs by reading about them doing it. LOLLLLLZ. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 05:30 am (UTC)Voyeurism is a kink; in some way, all porn and erotica can be seen as a form of voyeurism, no matter what medium it's being conveyed in. Tosh just happens to be a fangirl stand-in by default -- Gwen's got too strong of an emotional attachment to Jack (either romantic or otherwise, depends on your leanings) and Owen's too... Well, male. (which sounds more terrible than I intend it t) So the task falls to Toshiko, lonely and desperate for love, or at least a good thrill.
We all love a good Mary Sue, and hate the bad ones.
... And that's my unasked for two cents on the subject.
On a personal note, some of the voyeur!Tosh fics I like involve Jantosh, which removes the squick but keeps the kink. It's all, ultimately, a matter of set-up; for example, I hate noncon, but have no problem with BSDM. It's a fine line.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 10:37 am (UTC)I don't even know if I'm making sense right now, but that's fairly normal.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 10:34 am (UTC)But yes, it's when it's a throwaway and used for humour, rather than for the kink, that it bothers me.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 08:24 am (UTC)After reading the other comments, I really don't know what to add. We all have our lines that we will not cross. For me, it's non-con.
Now, is voyeurism something I would actually enjoy in real life? I joke about it, but back in university, I was on the roof of an apartment building with a friend and my roommate. We were just chatting and drinking beer when all the sudden my friend noticed a couple having sex in their apartment. I was the one who freaked out and had a hissy fit while the others watched. Yeah, I'm all talk, and the internet is the place where fantasies get let loose.
*I've also toyed with the idea of writing clown kink because of a footnote I read in Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex by Mary Roach. That's neither here not there for the purposes of this discussion, but probably illustrates that fic lets out my inner freak.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 10:51 am (UTC)Invasion of privacy as a kink = fine
Invasion of privacy as a joke = THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
My head = fun place to be.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 12:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-18 05:23 am (UTC)For one thing, I think agree with your differentiation between a kink and a joke. When it feels like it's being written as voyeurism kink, I think that's cool. Same for if the writer gives it an interesting take. When it seems like more like it's being played as a joke and taken for granted as cute and funny, I can see your issue with it.
The feeling I get from this trope sometimes is that Tosh is being used as a self-insert for the writer, and that feels kind of odd to me, too. (Of course, not all fics are like that.)